|
BaasLeonard (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
beroisimo this is the England AER squad and yes Saints might have found it harder against the England Conference side especially as some of them are Saints players - would be like playing a side lending them your star players!
beroisimo (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
umm this wusnt england a lol this was england aer a big comparison
beroisimo (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
all the saints are like we beat england u18sthts not true this team was england u18s trial squad not england u18sengland u18s wud av beten saints 50-0 if they played trust
JoshMclaurin1 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
you lot may have beaten enhgland under 18s but you couldn't beat hartpury college..... chin up boys!haha ahaha
mikeyruggerboy (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
"Not what you know but who you know..." ubiquitous - especially in most representational selection; from youth county upwards - nepatism prevails!
mugabe92 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
this is england u18 aer . this is not england u18. also alot of players were missing for this match for the england side.
elcamo1990 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
great stuff. looks like the saints guys should be wearing the england shirt, that was a thrashing.
sjws (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
4:42!! What a ball!!
roopsismassive (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
having played in the game (loosehead for saints) as many of us had to played together for the same amount of time as the england squad, they had no flair or passion...we had a point to prove and we proved it, we were better/are better and i think the way the Association of european rugby is set up is appauling...they choose the biggest and quickest and take no notice of skill levels slash talent - hence why we dominated them.
BaasLeonard (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Mister 6ft7RugbyPlayer the only shit her was the quality of England U18 performance. This was in fact their third game having lost the week before to Worcester. The argument is this is supose to be the best and clearly not the case. |