entropyincrease (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

its lame that cisco makes these ads instead of resorting to a technical counterattack

shp44 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

maybe this is why their stock dropped 18 cents this week.... a HUGE drop when your stock is only $0.42... lol!! negative $9.00 EPS? sadly enough, this is just a time bomb...

FlipNGenius (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

No. I don't think so. It's Web 2.0.

FlipNGenius (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

"You'll break the quantum field!"LOL!

thebertster (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

Nelly78...that rather depends on which Nortel reseller they work for...

Nelly78 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

Bertster....are my nortel reps trustworthy?

thebertster (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

The reason for this apparent anomaly is that the Nortel tool works by the user creating a valid Nortel config and then comparing against a Cisco config containing the closest comparable components.Sometimes this "naive" comparison will throw up invalid Cisco configs as highlighted here. The tool is being constantly updated to try to reduce these anomalies and select the most appropriate VALID equivalent Cisco config.This anomaly no longer occurs in the latest version of the tool.

cingularalex (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

CISCO's response is such kind low level of pale ads...

dmilliga (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

Why can't Cisco (or their surrogates) come back with a more technical response instead of specs from data sheets and these silly video responses.

shana747 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

does nortel know anything about configurations? maybe they should consult with a cisco engineer