|
ElectricResearcher (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
A few of Cindy Sage's Publications , this lady knows exactly what she is talking about "Epidemiology for Decision-Makers: A Visual Guide to Residential and Occupational EMF Epidemiology Results (1996), EMF Modelling and Land Use Planning: A Methodology for Assessing Land for School Siting or Residential Development (1994), The EMF Dilemma: Decision-Making Amid Uncertainty (1991), and Reduction of Magnetic Fields Through Electrical Switching and Wiring in the Home"
ElectricResearcher (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
I read the Bioinitiative Report. Being an Electrical Engineer who studies the effects of electric shock exposure on humans for the past 9 years I can verify that Cindy Sage knows what she is talking about. She is the spokeswoman for the Bioinitiative Committee. The report documents bioeffects, adverse health effects and public health conclusions about impacts of non-ionizing radiation -electromagnetic fields including extremely-low frequency ELF-EMF and radiofrequency/microwave or RF-EMF fields.
ilsadeborah (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
All this mobile phone radiation next to your ear can NEVER be good for mankind. If she is a scientist or not is not the question. She is being backed up by a lot of them. Of course there are a lot of other causes of cancer, and people in wars are dying as well. Put in context is alright but I think we have enough people on the plantet to be occupied with each of these subject..We are just trying to make the best of life no?? At least that is where Change starts :)
YF19sama (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
And how many irakians will die after this war, cosidering uranium bullets/missiles are massively used on the ground radiating the environement (ground, air, vital ressources).This is another subject. She talk about wirelless diseases around all the world for people trying to live in peace.
arjunus (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
I respect what you have wrote.But for the proof if she hase right you must wait.We think abouth 2 till 3 jears.Then there is the evedence thats happening in the uman body with microwaves with sizes smaller then the components of the uman body.
arjunus (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
If a lot off people are getting sick of it you must look wjat is hapening at those people.And not like now saying thats there is noting going on.Look whats cosses the ilnes at those people.Why can't the sleep.It's all over the world the same health problems.
oneirondreamer (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
The problem with this type of discussion is that there is no context. It is clear that radiation of all types can be dangerous. The question should be given context, is EMF from cell phone radiation more likely to cause cancer than standing in the sun, or drinking coffee? I suspect that context is not given by people like this, because it would make most people see it a non-issue. Some things need to be put in context. How many people died in Iraq this year, that's important
wesman83 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
cindy sage is not a scientist and she has no clue what shes talking about, shes just benefiting from the hysteria of an uninformed public. "precautionary principle" is NOT science
ynkl7abg (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
test
nrobnas (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
The Germans are still in denial about cell phone dangers eventhough there are articles in the newspapers about the dangers of cell phones. My son(13)is the only one out of 26 w/o a cell phone- he had cancer!!! No one wants to hear cell phones are bad! |
